.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to grandmotherweb.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="grandmotherweb:1432571"]I'm basically talking to myselves. you don't have to read my posts. [URL]https://www.huffpost.com/entry/marc-randazza-alex-jones-connecticut-judge_n_5c919bd6e4b0dbf58e459cf5[/URL] 'Connecticut Judge: Attorney Marc Randazza Is Too Unethical To Represent Alex Jones In January, the attorney filed what�s called a pro hac vice application to be added to the Sandy Hook case as an out-of-state lawyer. Judges routinely sign off on these applications. The Connecticut judge, however, swiftly rejected Randazza�s application, citing �serious misconduct� by the attorney. [...] The ruling was a humiliating setback for a lawyer who styles himself as a top free speech attorney. So was getting canned by his marquee client. Jones declared that he had no option, given the rejection of Randazza�s pro hac vice application, but to �choose new counsel untainted by the claims of misconduct.�' let the record show that my posting about Marc Randazza on this forum is not to be misconstrued as an attempt to contact Marc Randazza.[/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.004 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][